Apparently President Obama knows his stuff when it comes to selecting key governement positions. The latest rumor from this article in the Wall Street Journal has our very own Alan Krueger (author of the recent book WHAT MAKES A TERRORIST) being tapped as Timothy Geithner’s assistant secretary for economic policy. Also in the administration is Cass Sunstein (author of the PUP books A CONSTITUTION OF MANY MINDS and REPUBLIC.COM 2.0), Obama’s choice to be administrator of information and regulatory affairs, and Anne-Marie Slaughter (author of A NEW WORLD ORDER) was tapped for director of the State Department’s policy-planning staff.
WHEN the documentary filmmaker Astra Taylor speaks of a cinema of ideas, she means it more literally than most. Her first film, “Zizek!” (2005) accompanied the Slovene philosopher Slavoj Zizek on a lecture tour. Her second, “Examined Life,” opening Wednesday at the IFC Center, recruits a wide array of thinkers and theorists to muse out loud about the role of philosophy in our lives, playing off the Socratic observation that “the unexamined life is not worth living.”
Examined Life is composed of interviews with a virtual who’s who of philosophers including several PUP authors–Kwame Anthony Appiah, Cornel West, and Martha Nussbaum.
Join Director Astra Taylor and Kwame Anthony Appiah for a special screening of the movie tonight at the IFC Center. Show times are 7:35 and 9:45. Contact the IFC Center for tickets and more information.
A trick question! Tasmania is the only Australian state that does not have an official bird. From Birdscapes:
Australia has the emu as its national bird (it is thought never to take a step backwards) and the state birds are:
New South Wales: laughing kookaburra
Queensland: brolga (a large crane species)
Victoria: helmeted honeyeater (an endemic subspecies of the yellowtuftedhoneyeater—I wonder how many people in Melbourne could
identify one?)
South Australia: Australian magpie
Western Australia: black swan
Northern Territory: wedge-tailed eagle
Australia Capital Territory: gang-gang cockatoo
Only Tasmania wouldn’t play this game (why don’t they settle for their subspecies, the clinking currawong?). But all these other states have a floral emblem too, and most have a mammalian one (in South Australia, it’s the hairy-nosed wombat).
If there is a grand truth about science, it is that science is a collective enterprise.Researchers trade ideas, borrow any that come their way.Colleagues and rivals are indistinguishable, borrowing becomes what in other circles goes by the name of theft; opponents are generally recognized, sometimes not, more often in the vast flood of papers, lost.Vanishing few are the discoveries made by a single individual.Strange, then, that even today the media so often portrays the great advances of science as springing fully formed from the brow of towering geniuses who work in splendid isolation.
FRANZ KAFKA:The Office Writings edited by Stanley Corngold, Jack Greenberg, and Benno Wagner, has been in the news recently. Read Alexander Provan’s thoughtful round-up of recent Kafka books, including this one, in The Nation. In addition, Eric Banks reviews the book in the Barnes & Noble Review.
Dora Costa and Matthew Kahn’sHEROES AND COWARDS, a groundbreaking study of 40,000 Civil War soldiers that reveals the benefits and limits of diversity, has been making the news in the past few days. Larry Gordon discusses the new book in the Los Angeles Times, an article that has been picked up in a number national papers including The Baltimore Sun, and David Glenn writes about it in The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Just to recap, we are posting trivia questions drawn from the book Birdscapes: Birds in Our Imagination and Experience by veteran birder and former chief executive of Cambridge University Press Jeremy Mynott. We hope you will post your guesses and explanations below in the comments section. The official answer will follow by a day, so check back again soon!
Our Director Peter Dougherty was invited by the Seminary Co-op bookstores in Chicago to write about our new book ANIMAL SPIRITS: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism in their “Editors Speak” forum, and for your reading pleasure, here it is! According to their website, “Editors Speak” will present a rare opportunity to literary and university press editors to discuss and explain the books they have published. While serving on one hand as a review of the book, we also hope this will offer a unique insight into the publishing process and the choices made before a book goes to press. You should check out their site regularly to see what’s cooking over there.
But I digress…. Peter shines a light on the fascinating back story of how ANIMAL SPIRITS came to be, and its role not only in this current financial disaster but for economists and public policy folks of the future.
What have Saddam Hussein, Hitler, Napoleon, Mexico, Albania and the Royal Air Force got in common?
The question may sound like the set up for a bad joke, but the actual answer is that all of them used (or continue to use, in some cases) the eagle as an emblem. As Mynott notes,
“Eagles seems inevitably to attract the epithets ‘majestic’ or ‘magnificent,’ and they have been of enormous symbolic importance over the ages and in many cultures across the world. They were the birds of augury for the Greeks; the emblem of empire and power for the Romans, Charlemagne, Napoleon, Hitler, and Saddam Hussein (not an altogether wonderful team, but the Royal Air Force uses it too); and an icon in many mythologies and religions (in Christianity, for example, an eagle is almost a standard fitting on church lecterns)…By common agreement the eagle really is the king of birds, and therefore the ideal logo for all manner of commercial as well as political purposes worldwide. “
Mynott also reports that The Scotsman conducted a poll in 2004 in which the eagle was named favorite bird and selected as an emblem of Scotland. Mynott writes of this outcome:
“But with just one pair in England and the Scottish birds largely restricted to wilderness areas, how many people have ever seen one, except on TV? You would think a “favourite” bird would also have to be a familiar one, like a favourite chair or book? Could you have a favourite film you had never seen, or a favourite town you had never visited? Or does the eagle’s mystique actually depend on its remoteness?”
Also, just prior to departing for Washington, DC and a new post with President Obama’s administration, Anne-Marie Slaughter lectured at the Carnegie Council in New York. “Everybody wants to be Wilson’s heir, or at least everyone in the last decade,” she noted at the beginning of her presentation before turning to the subject of the book in which she, along with Ikenberry, Thomas J. Knock and Tony Smith, considers George W. Bush’s foreign policy in relation to Wilsonian ideals. A complete transcript of the evening, including an insightful Q&A session, is available here.
Okay, perhaps that isn’t the question, but as the site quotes the wonderful Ford Madox Ford: “Open the book to page ninety-nine and read, and the quality of the whole will be revealed to you.”
Featuring commentary and interviews from Princeton University Press authors, the PUP Blog is a highly respected, timely and indispensable source for learning, understanding and reflection.
Arnold writes:So, if the demand for mortgages collapses, all it takes to get back to 2006 levels is for mortgage underwriters to take a 20 percent pay cut? In a world with no discontinuities, we would not get crazy subprime lending and sudden sharp drops in demand. The no-discontinuity world is what classical economists are trained to work with. Too bad it i […]
I have taken photos of birds that are so bad, out of focus, poorly exposed, wings cut off, etc. We all have, but why would anyone keep them? I delete them, especially when I can't identify them...hah. But I have to say, there are photos I should have deleted long ago that still sit in my collection. The Cooper's Hawk photo above is one of them....i […]
That’s the title of my piece in the Fin last week. As with my previous column, Catallaxy was out with a comment long before I got around to posting here, but it seemed to me to miss the point fairly comprehensively. Ever since the first signs of the global financial crisis emerged back in 2007, […]
Arnold writes:Suppose that a bunch of mortgage underwriters get laid off. There are two possible full employment equilibria. (a) They can be instantly employed as dishwashers at 20 cents an hour. (b)They can be employed as health insurance claims processors at a salary close to what they were making as mortgage underwriters. The reason that we don't obs […]
Kevin Outterson writes of “Hand Sanitizers as Agent Orange”: Over at CommonHealth, Aayesha rounds up the literature on the limits of hand sanitizers, but fails to mention the collateral damage to the skin microbiome. Alcohol-based hand sanitizers kill many bacteria, viruses and fungi, but they don’t selectively target pathogens. They kill a wide swath of [.. […]
1. Via Chris F. Masse, alligator eats capitalist. 2. Pizza topping mark-ups. 3. Markets in everything the culture that is Japan. 4. Trade Diversion economics blog. 5. Symposium on how to fix the housing market, including me. […]
Why are cell phone taxes so high? In the United States we tax cell phones more than beer. The usual explanations for high taxes, negative externalities and low elasticity of demand don’t seem to apply to cell phones. Our colleagues Thomas Stratmann and Matt Mitchell offer an answer based in political economy. …no single politician […]
Next week, I'm going to debate Modeled Behavior's Karl Smith on "How Deserving Are the Poor?" Logistics:Date: Wednesday, February 1Time: 6:00-9:00 PMLocation: Johnson Center Meeting Room A, George Mason University (Fairfax Campus)My strategy, as usual, is to use an uncontroversial moral premise to show that the status quo is absurd. The […]
There has been an increasing discussion about the proliferation of flawed research in psychology and medicine, with some landmark events being John Ioannides’s article, “Why most published research findings are false” (according to Google Scholar, cited 973 times since its appearance in 2005), the scandals of Marc Hauser and Diederik Stapel, two leading psyc […]
Justin Wolfers writes: Predictably enough, I spent yesterday reading lefty blogs trumpeting Corak’s analysis, and right-leaning blogs who didn’t want to believe the inequality-mobility link, endorsing Winship. But both missed the bigger picture implications. Either you’re convinced by Corak that the data can be trusted, and that they show there’s a strong li […]