Hardy Green, former books editor at Business Week, has created a new blog devoted to the wonderful world of business (and judging by a few of the early posts, popular economics) book publishing. Check it out here.
Joseph Frank spent roughly 30 years composing a 5-volume biography of Dostoevsky that has been widely considered a masterpiece, winning critical raves as well as awards. Princeton University Press has just published a newly abridged volume, DOSTOEVSKY: A Writer in his Time that has also been reviewed very positively, and at a mere 959 printed pages, is a the perfect stocking stuffer for the person on your list with an impeccable library!
If you don’t want to take my word for it, please read Michael Dirda‘s riveting review of the book in yesterday’s Wall Street Journal. Our Australian book-lovers are taking note, as well. See Geordie Williamson‘s thoughtful review in The Australian.
Though many of us blindly catapult through the holidays, steamrolling any obstacle in our way, let us pause to consider the words of PUP author Avishai Margalit: “It is our compromises that tell us who we are.” Well said, sir!
Follow the link to listen to Avishai’s interview with our friends down under.
Maybe next year his advice will save you and yours some time and energy that otherwise would have been spent on arguments and hurt feelings!
by Jessica Pellien | Filed in: Economics | 9:26am EST
Over at the Monthly Review, they have posted an opinion piece and an interview with Teresa Ghilarducci. Teresa is a proponent of Guaranteed Retirement Accounts and wrote about the cracks in the retirement system and the need for a new type of retirement program in her PUP book When I’m Sixty-four.
If you are worried about how you will afford to retire — especially if you are relying on 401K accounts for retirement — this is required viewing and her book is required reading.
It was great to see the other day Eleanor Harris’s blog post on NewScientist.com’s CultureLab blog on the best books of 2009. She asked a few New Scientist staffers to pick their favorites this past year and Graham Lawton, Deputy Editor of the magazine, selected our very own CODES OF THE UNDERWORLD: How Criminals Communicate, by Diego Gambetta. Lawton admists this is more social science than hard science but it made his list nonetheless! What were your favorite science books of the year? We’d love to read your picks!
For another take on the shuttered industry publication, read PUP author Susan Wise Bauer’s blog. Click here for her hilarious and oh-so-true post, “Kirkus Closes, Author Yawns.”
Down with snark! Hey, not so fast. Check out this Gawker post on Kirkus and other recent media casualties. And how, pray tell, can a pre pub review be “anodyne” and for whom? Author, reviewer or reader? Discuss.
I admit, I had never heard of The Black List until I read Elizabeth Currid’s article in today’s Los Angeles Times.
So, for those of you not “in the know” either, here’s a quick description from Currid:
Known as the Black List, this annual ranking of the year’s most-talked-about unproduced screenplays has the power to catapult an unknown screenwriter into instant talks with a major studio. That’s how Diablo Cody, writer of “Juno,” got her break.
Currid, who previously examined the importance of cultural sites for economics in The Warhol Economy, looks at the box-office success of past black list scripts. This practical approach is fascinating.
Altogether, 67 Black List scripts from 2005 were turned into movies between 2006 and 2008, and they collectively generated $2.5 billion in U.S. box-office receipts. That figure is equivalent to the total of the top 10 earners in 2008.
Given this track record, why has the Black List achieved such inordinate influence?
Head over to the LA Times web site to read the complete article, and for a sneak preview of this year’s possible black list scripts, visit Indie Movies Online. The official list is circulated only to industry executives, though it almost always slips out into the media.
by Jessica Pellien | Filed in: Economics | 11:16am EST
“From about age 10 on — when we first develop well-defined preferences — we endure receiving gifts that we do not like,” Waldfogel writes in “Scroogenomics“. “To make matters worse, we are obliged to pretend to be grateful.”
Click through to view an interview Joel taped on December 3rd with Reuters UK. This was just in advance of his event with the London School of Economics (which conveniently and coincidentally enough is also available online here.)
And if that simply isn’t enough Scroogenomics for you, Joel also appeared on RSA Thursdays which you can view below.
According to this recent segment on Newshour, older workers are facing unique challenges in the current economy. Reporter Mike McGuire, for example notes that, “because of the prevalence of internships…At no time since slavery have so many people worked for free in America.”
Paul Solman also speaks with Teresa Ghilarducci, Princeton author of When I’m Sixty-64, who makes a case that “retirement is actually good for people.”
Featuring commentary and interviews from Princeton University Press authors, the PUP Blog is a highly respected, timely and indispensable source for learning, understanding and reflection.
Arnold writes:So, if the demand for mortgages collapses, all it takes to get back to 2006 levels is for mortgage underwriters to take a 20 percent pay cut? In a world with no discontinuities, we would not get crazy subprime lending and sudden sharp drops in demand. The no-discontinuity world is what classical economists are trained to work with. Too bad it i […]
I have taken photos of birds that are so bad, out of focus, poorly exposed, wings cut off, etc. We all have, but why would anyone keep them? I delete them, especially when I can't identify them...hah. But I have to say, there are photos I should have deleted long ago that still sit in my collection. The Cooper's Hawk photo above is one of them....i […]
That’s the title of my piece in the Fin last week. As with my previous column, Catallaxy was out with a comment long before I got around to posting here, but it seemed to me to miss the point fairly comprehensively. Ever since the first signs of the global financial crisis emerged back in 2007, […]
Arnold writes:Suppose that a bunch of mortgage underwriters get laid off. There are two possible full employment equilibria. (a) They can be instantly employed as dishwashers at 20 cents an hour. (b)They can be employed as health insurance claims processors at a salary close to what they were making as mortgage underwriters. The reason that we don't obs […]
Kevin Outterson writes of “Hand Sanitizers as Agent Orange”: Over at CommonHealth, Aayesha rounds up the literature on the limits of hand sanitizers, but fails to mention the collateral damage to the skin microbiome. Alcohol-based hand sanitizers kill many bacteria, viruses and fungi, but they don’t selectively target pathogens. They kill a wide swath of [.. […]
1. Via Chris F. Masse, alligator eats capitalist. 2. Pizza topping mark-ups. 3. Markets in everything the culture that is Japan. 4. Trade Diversion economics blog. 5. Symposium on how to fix the housing market, including me. […]
Why are cell phone taxes so high? In the United States we tax cell phones more than beer. The usual explanations for high taxes, negative externalities and low elasticity of demand don’t seem to apply to cell phones. Our colleagues Thomas Stratmann and Matt Mitchell offer an answer based in political economy. …no single politician […]
Next week, I'm going to debate Modeled Behavior's Karl Smith on "How Deserving Are the Poor?" Logistics:Date: Wednesday, February 1Time: 6:00-9:00 PMLocation: Johnson Center Meeting Room A, George Mason University (Fairfax Campus)My strategy, as usual, is to use an uncontroversial moral premise to show that the status quo is absurd. The […]
There has been an increasing discussion about the proliferation of flawed research in psychology and medicine, with some landmark events being John Ioannides’s article, “Why most published research findings are false” (according to Google Scholar, cited 973 times since its appearance in 2005), the scandals of Marc Hauser and Diederik Stapel, two leading psyc […]
Justin Wolfers writes: Predictably enough, I spent yesterday reading lefty blogs trumpeting Corak’s analysis, and right-leaning blogs who didn’t want to believe the inequality-mobility link, endorsing Winship. But both missed the bigger picture implications. Either you’re convinced by Corak that the data can be trusted, and that they show there’s a strong li […]