Nothing says summer reading like a book about the last poems of some of the greatest American poets. That is, if you are Woody Allen. No Stieg Larsson for Mr. Allen this summer, as he was snapped staring intently into the pages of Helen Vendler’s latest, LAST LOOKS, LAST BOOKS. England’s Daily Mail featured pictures [...]
Read the complete article at Publishers Weekly, but here’s the opening paragraph:
It’s taken 50 years but Dorothy Jane Mills, formerly Dorothy Z. Seymour, wife of the late baseball historian Harold Seymour, has received long overdue acknowledgment as coauthor along with her late husband of three seminal books on the history of baseball that are considered the scholarly standard in the field. In a formal announcement by Oxford University Press executive editor Tim Bent, Mills was given formal credit and her name will now accompany her late husband’s on the books’ covers and title pages.
The most interesting aspect (at least to me) of this story is that Mrs. Mills asked her husband if she could be listed as a co-author and he said no and that was that.
She said, however, that that didn’t become a sore point in the marriage. “That’s how I was raised. In those days a girl was supposed to be a helper and an assistant.”
Thank goodness those days are now past. Congratulations to Mrs. Mills and Oxford University Press on this terrific news.
What’s the big fuss? It’s difficult to put into words what an awesome book this is. I’ve been trying all week to capture the essence of this book, but I don’t think I did it justice. First time I saw a copy of the book was last Friday and it blew me away. It’s like each page was hand crafted–and the binding, well, you just have to see it for yourself. The Publications of the Department of Art and Archaeology, Princeton University, do things right. Let’s just say you probably will want to build your own private library to hold this tome (as Danielle, one of our FB followers, called the book.) Second best, if you have a sturdy coffee table, you could put it there, but the book weighs 7 lbs., so be careful.
How do you enter? Go to PUP’s facebook page and click on the “like” icon to become our fan. Once you’re a fan, then you are automatically entered to win our weekly book giveaways. Or are you into Twitter? If so, go to PUP’s Twitter Page and click on the “Sign Up” button. Tomorrow afternoon, 3:30 ET, we will be picking the lucky winner. You have until then to become part of the draw. So if you “like” what we’re doing with our PUP book giveaways, let us know by becoming a PUP fan.
At Princeton University Press, we have the privilege of getting our intellectual feet wet with some of the bestcomparative literature academia has to offer, but unless you count Carnegie Lake, Princeton offers few opportunities for exercising one’s sea legs.
Fortunately, we will be able to combine our loves of navigating waters and words later this fall with the forthcoming release of Stanford comparative literature scholar Margaret Cohen’s The Novel and the Sea, which explores the rise of the popular prose form through seafaring works by the likes of Daniel Defoe and Joseph Conrad.
The show runs until September 4th, but if you would rather explore the topic from your computer screen or the printed page, you can learn more about The Novel and the Sea and Margaret Cohen’s other Princeton titles here.
It’s not often that an author attempts to coin the name for an entire generation of writers, but that is exactly what Lawrence Jackson has done with The Indignant Generation: A Narrative History of African American Writers and Critics, 1934-1960. This group of writers exists somewhere between the Harlem Renaissance and the Civil Rights period and until now has been, as a group, unnamed.
I asked Jackson how he came up with the title of the book and it turns out he had another title in mind when the book was first underway.
“When I arrived at the National Humanities Center in North Carolina in the fall of 2004 I had a title all ready for my book project, an epic literary history designed to fill the gap between the more plentiful works on the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920s and the Black Arts Movement of the 1960s. The book title was A Song in the Front Yard, after a Gwendolyn Brooks poem,” says Jackson. “To Brooks the poem’s title was ironic, because the speaker in the poem hoped to claim not just the front yard but the back alley too. I loved the sound of it, and so did my fellow humanists in Tar Heel country. But no editors had any confidence in those words to lure an audience.”
Though poetic, A Song in the Front Yard soon gave away to Indignation, but Jackson had not quite arrived at title of the book as it stands now.
“Next try, and the handle for the subsequent four years, was A Renaissance of Indignation. Educated Americans knew about the American Renaissance of the 1840s and 50s and the New Negro or Harlem Renaissance, so that word seemed worth its weight in gold. But when the chapters sailed out for review the balking began in earnest,” explains Jackson. “I learned that my title was contradictory, fussy and fractious. And by using a semi colon to clarify the work–’A Narrative History of African American Writers and Critics, 1934-1960′—I was guilty of writing the equivalent of War and Peace: A Novel.”
Though ‘renaissance’ was lost in the shuffle, ‘indignation’ stuck. Jackson describes the word as being like “a talisman, a fetish, a raven, an albatross.”
He further explains, “Indignation became the lingua franca that united my writers as a group, distinguishing them from the folk artists of the 1920s and the revolutionaries of the 1960s. In a letter detailing the power of Native Son, Ralph Ellison had praised the ‘indignant consciousness’ of Bigger Thomas, a shift in attitude among the lumpenproletariat that Ellison wagered would play a crucial role in making representative democracy in the United States a possibility. This kind of unapologetic defiance seemed to characterize the bunch, and, piggybacking a bit off of Tom Brokaw’s book title, The Indignant Generation was born.”
The Indignant Generation will publish in December 2010, but you might enjoy watching this video of Jackson describing the project and the research involved.
by Christina Lau | Filed in: Awards - Twitter | 1:21pm EST
For the first time, a scholar representing the field of Islamic Studies has won the Gerda Henkel Prize presented by the Gerda Henkel Foundation – PUP author Gudrun Krämer is that scholar. Many congratulations, Gudrun!
Since its founding in 1976, the Gerda Henkel Foundation has been funding research projects in the historical humanities, more recently starting a program dedicated to studying “Islam, the modern state and transnational movements.”
Of their honoree, Chairman of the foundation Dr. Michael Hanssler says, “Krämer’s work helps us to obtain far deeper understanding of Islamic cultures and societies. Working from a sound historical basis, the winner of the 2010 Gerda Henkel Prize is then able to give us a more nuanced view of our everyday reality.”
Just one of the 504 color illustrations in PUP’s book giveaway this week. They say a picture is worth a thousand words–then this illustration alone, is worth a gazillion words.
“[E]very book in this collection represents an arm stretched out across vast spaces of time. Gospel books, books of liturgy, anthologies of music and prayers, guides to holy places were there to make time itself stand still, in the eternal presence of God. This collection has many copies of such texts. They stretch over an expanse of time from the 6th to the 19th century. But the volumes that speak, perhaps, most poignantly to modern historians are those that show the reach of medieval Byzantines into the treasures of a past that was already centuries, even millennia, distant from them.”–from the Foreword, Greek Manuscripts at Princeton, Sixth to Nineteenth Century: A Descriptive Catalogue
To be a part of tomorrow’s book giveaway, follow PUP on Facebook and/or Twitter. All followers are automatically entered to win.
“Google: Young Will Have to Change Names to Escape ‘Cyber Past.’ Eric Schmidt suggested that young people should be entitled to change their identity to escape their misspent youth, which is now recorded in excruciating detail on social networking… sites such as Facebook.”–The New Media Journal.us
According to the Council on Foreign Relations, this award “is a significant award for a book on international affairs. It was endowed by Arthur Ross in 2001 to honor nonfiction works, in English or translation, that merit special attention for bringing forth new information that changes our understanding of events or problems, developing analytical approaches that allow new and different insights into critical issues, or providing new ideas that help resolve foreign policy problems.”
Congratulations on this great achievement, Dan!
For a complete list of recent award-winning Princeton University Press books, please click here.
Dan Reiter has authored two groundbreaking works on war with PUP: Democracies at War (with Allan C. Stam) and How Wars End. With detailed analysis of over twenty major conflicts, Dan’s works bring clarity to the infinitely complex subject. His summer reading choices broaden the scope of war even further, dealing with the day-to-day life of a solider in Vietnam, and the struggles of a country in the aftermath of WWII.
“One of my more enjoyable reads this summer was Matternhorn: A Novel of the Vietnam War, by Karl Marlantes. It’s a Vietnam War-era novel, written by a Vietnam veteran. The novel follows one Marine unit through several weeks of combat operations in a mountainous border region. It is one of the few Vietnam War era novels which primarily focuses on relatively conventional combat operations, rather than on things like pacification, counter-guerrilla strategy, and/or relations with South Vietnamese civilians. It is well-written, and filled with lots of gritty description of a soldier’s life that only a combat veteran would know. I also appreciated the depiction of race relations among Marines, which forms an important portion of the plot. I would highly recommend it to anyone interested in the Vietnam War or in combat fiction. I would say it’s one of the better Vietnam War novels I’ve read, perhaps alongside The 13th Valley by John del Vecchio.”
“I am currently reading Austerity Britain: 1945-1951 by David Kynaston. It is a social and economic history of Britain during the immediate postwar period, describing the everyday life of the British population, as well as relevant domestic policies embraced by the government. The kinds of areas it covers include housing, food rationing, and popular culture phenomena like fashion, sport, and the emergence of television. I am getting a much better sense of how surprisingly difficult day to day life was for the British population during this period, and the lively nature of British government debate about what policies should be embraced to push forward British recovery. There was, for example, a quite open embrace of socialism by a number of politicians. I would recommend it to anyone interested in British history, or to anyone who enjoys getting a very textured feel of what day to day life is like at a particular place in a particular time. Regarding the latter, perhaps the kind of person who relishes the period authenticity of the television show Mad Men would enjoy this book.”
Let us know what you think in the comments, or follow us on Facebook or Twitter.
Timothy Gowers, editor of The Princeton Companion to Mathematics, is mentioned in today’s New York Times article “Step 1: Post Elusive Proof. Step 2: Watch Fireworks”. In an account of a recent attempt to solve what is known as the “P versus NP problem”—one of the most important unsolved problems in theoretical computer science and all of mathematics –reporter John Markoff explores how online collaboration, including analysis and commentary on blogs and wikis, is changing the way science is practiced. Gowers created the Polymath Project in 2009 to encourage collaborative mathematical research projects (see http://polymathprojects.org/about/ for more details).
The Princeton Companion to Mathematics explains the P versus NP problem in articles IV.20 (Computational Complexity, this is an excerpt from the larger article) and V.24 (The P versus NP Problem).
Penned by William G. Bowen, Matthew M. Chingos, and Michaels S. McPherson, Crossing the Finish Line is a groundbreaking book that gives us detailed insight into the crisis of college completion at America’s public universities, examining factors such as dropout rates and their relationships to various demographic groups. According to the ASA, it is the best book in the Sociology of Education published in 2008 or 2009.
Crossing the Finish Line has also received an Honorable Mention for the 2009 PROSE Award for Excellence – Education.
For a complete list of recent award-winning Princeton University Press books, please click here.
Featuring commentary and interviews from Princeton University Press authors, the PUP Blog is a highly respected, timely and indispensable source for learning, understanding and reflection.
Arnold writes:So, if the demand for mortgages collapses, all it takes to get back to 2006 levels is for mortgage underwriters to take a 20 percent pay cut? In a world with no discontinuities, we would not get crazy subprime lending and sudden sharp drops in demand. The no-discontinuity world is what classical economists are trained to work with. Too bad it i […]
I have taken photos of birds that are so bad, out of focus, poorly exposed, wings cut off, etc. We all have, but why would anyone keep them? I delete them, especially when I can't identify them...hah. But I have to say, there are photos I should have deleted long ago that still sit in my collection. The Cooper's Hawk photo above is one of them....i […]
That’s the title of my piece in the Fin last week. As with my previous column, Catallaxy was out with a comment long before I got around to posting here, but it seemed to me to miss the point fairly comprehensively. Ever since the first signs of the global financial crisis emerged back in 2007, […]
Arnold writes:Suppose that a bunch of mortgage underwriters get laid off. There are two possible full employment equilibria. (a) They can be instantly employed as dishwashers at 20 cents an hour. (b)They can be employed as health insurance claims processors at a salary close to what they were making as mortgage underwriters. The reason that we don't obs […]
Kevin Outterson writes of “Hand Sanitizers as Agent Orange”: Over at CommonHealth, Aayesha rounds up the literature on the limits of hand sanitizers, but fails to mention the collateral damage to the skin microbiome. Alcohol-based hand sanitizers kill many bacteria, viruses and fungi, but they don’t selectively target pathogens. They kill a wide swath of [.. […]
1. Via Chris F. Masse, alligator eats capitalist. 2. Pizza topping mark-ups. 3. Markets in everything the culture that is Japan. 4. Trade Diversion economics blog. 5. Symposium on how to fix the housing market, including me. […]
Why are cell phone taxes so high? In the United States we tax cell phones more than beer. The usual explanations for high taxes, negative externalities and low elasticity of demand don’t seem to apply to cell phones. Our colleagues Thomas Stratmann and Matt Mitchell offer an answer based in political economy. …no single politician […]
Next week, I'm going to debate Modeled Behavior's Karl Smith on "How Deserving Are the Poor?" Logistics:Date: Wednesday, February 1Time: 6:00-9:00 PMLocation: Johnson Center Meeting Room A, George Mason University (Fairfax Campus)My strategy, as usual, is to use an uncontroversial moral premise to show that the status quo is absurd. The […]
There has been an increasing discussion about the proliferation of flawed research in psychology and medicine, with some landmark events being John Ioannides’s article, “Why most published research findings are false” (according to Google Scholar, cited 973 times since its appearance in 2005), the scandals of Marc Hauser and Diederik Stapel, two leading psyc […]
Justin Wolfers writes: Predictably enough, I spent yesterday reading lefty blogs trumpeting Corak’s analysis, and right-leaning blogs who didn’t want to believe the inequality-mobility link, endorsing Winship. But both missed the bigger picture implications. Either you’re convinced by Corak that the data can be trusted, and that they show there’s a strong li […]