In the aftermath of World War II, a surprisingly large number of poor countries were upset by revolution: Vietnam, China, Cuba, Algeria, Ethiopia, Cambodia, Mozambique, Angola, Afghanistan, Iran, and Nicaragua. Revolutionaries in these geographically and culturally disparate countries came to power through different routes, but once in power they had remarkably similar ideas about how to remake their states and societies. In this passionate analysis of the course of these revolutions, Forrest Colburn suggests that shared institutional and policy choices of revolutionary elites arose from a fashionable political imagination.
Paradoxically, in an era marked by the demise of European colonialism, it was Europeans--mainly Marx, Engels, and Lenin--who supplied the vision of what could replace colonialism. Colburn traces the diffusion of this intoxicating political imagination not to the Soviet Union, but instead to Western Europe and North America, where socialism was rarely more than political fantasy. In Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia, this imagination inspired revolution, but more importantly led to sadly flawed ideas about how to eliminate poverty and inequality. The vogue for revolution in poor countries withered away in a descent accelerated, but not initiated, by the East European events of 1989-1991. This lucid book clarifies why so many countries were so profoundly wrecked in the frenzied pursuit of a dreamt-up world.
"[Colburn's] basic conclusion is that purveyors of both Marxism and its bourgeois "analogue," modernization theory, have got it all wrong these past five decades. It is not "revolutionary situations" that produce revolutions so much as revolutionaries, imbued with ideas learned from the West. . . . [the author] explores the matter with great deftness and sophistication."--Times Literary Supplement
"This concise and impressive volume provides a highly original approach to understanding 22 revolutions in poor countries since World War II."--Paul Hollander, National Review
"Colburn makes a strong case for the primacy of politics in Third World revolutions."--Foreign Affairs
". . . a worthwhile thought piece leading the reader to a consideration of a wide variety of phenomenon in poor countries whose characters are in need of effective analysis."--Choice
File created: 2/8/2016